This January, We’re Finally Going to Get Our “Super Crash”

You, like me, may be a bear at heart. You probably joined Sure Money a long time before I got here. The guy whose place I took was a brilliant market strategist who was just a little early in my view. There is not a scintilla of doubt in my mind that his view will ultimately be proven resoundingly correct. Those of us of a bearish persuasion will make a lot of money over the next few years.

And it looks like we’re going to be able to start in January 2018 (and we should be prepared and at least partly positioned before that). Here’s why.

The Real Reason This Rally Has Lasted So Long (And Confused The LAMPP)

Most of the time, you should ignore the headlines. But every once in awhile, one comes along that you should sit up and pay attention to.

Whenever you see a news item with the words “economists say” in conjunction with anything central bank related, you had better pay attention. It is the clarion call of the central bankers. These so called “economists” are really the lackeys and mouthpieces of the monetary policymakers. Regardless of whether it’s the Fed, or one of its two major partners in crime, the ECB or the BoJ, when you see the words “economists say” in reference to those central banks, it matters.

Yesterday there was just such a case, and it matters to the well-being of your investments. It matters big time. So listen up.

Recently I have been speculating with you on why I think that the short term LAMPP has been way early, if not wrong. I think it’s just early, but I’m biased. I hate to think I might be wrong, but alas, s*** happens.

Now the LAMPP is based entirely on what the Fed and US Treasury are doing in the market. And it has worked very well for the last 10 years since the time when the Fed started directly intervening in the financial markets in a way that it had never done in the past.

But there are outside forces that come to bear, in particular, the actions of the Fed’s two biggest cohort central banks.

Under normal circumstances throughout history, big central banks have moved in the same direction over roughly the same period. So the ECB’s and BoJ’s actions would normally be in step with the Fed. While the timing of their actions would differ somewhat, it would normally be unthinkable for central banks to be working at cross purposes.

That’s what’s happening today, and why I think the short term LAMPP gave us a sell signal 7 weeks ago and the US markets have kept plowing higher. So Booyah or Boohoo! Rule Number 2 – “The trend is your friend,” (aka, Don’t fight the tape) has superseded Rule Number 1 – “Don’t fight the Fed” for a few weeks.

I believe that the reason that the short term LAMPP signal has been wrong so far was because Yellen’s fellow central bank godfathers, the BoJ’s Kuroda, and the ECB’s Draghi, have continued to print money and pump it into world markets hand over fist. While that money goes first into their own domestic banking systems, the fact is that all roads lead to Wall Street, and some of that home grown money, in Europe in particular, hits the road to Wall Street as soon as it comes hot off Draghi’s press.

13 of the Fed’s Primary Dealers are also major operators in Europe and Japan. In fact 5 of those US Primary Dealers ARE in fact, Eurozone banks who are direct correspondents with the ECB. They are Deutsche Bank, Societe General, BNP Paribas, Credit Suisse, and UBS. They operate in both European markets and the US simultaneously. And of course all the other US Primary Dealers have massive trading operations in Europe. For instance, the giant squid, Goldman Sachs, has its tentacles everywhere. So, of course does JPM, and most other big US dealers.

Therefore, money that the ECB prints in Europe is instantaneously available to be traded in New York. Make no mistake, the banks use that many to buy US Treasuries. That injects cash into the US markets which can then be used to buy stocks.

The chart below illustrates. It represents the total US dollar equivalent of the cash that the Fed, ECB, and BoJ inject into the worldwide liquidity pool (Note: The terms money, liquidity, and cash are essentially interchangeable. That’s all that liquidity really means-money or cash).

As you can see, even though the Fed stopped injecting net new money into the system at the end of 2014, the BoJ and ECB were just getting revved up. It is unprecedented in recent history, but the fact is that the foreign central banks kept the US markets liquified throughout the period where the Fed was essentially dormant.

I say “essentially” because the Fed kept its balance sheet flat by buying MBS every month to replace its MBS holdings that were being paid down every month. Even though those MBS replacement purchases served only to keep the Fed’s balance sheet flat, they have still been cashing out Primary Dealers, lately to the tune of around $25 billion a month.

That cash helped the Primary Dealers to continue to support rising stock prices. Those flows into dealer accounts are integral to US market performance. They are included in the LAMPP for that reason. They are one of the reasons the LAMPP stayed green in spite of the Fed keeping its balance sheet flat.

Between that cash, and the inflows from the ECB and BoJ, the dealers were able to continue to mark up prices. Their customers, primarily big institutions and hedge funds were like pigs, happily feeding at the stock market garbage trough.

Back to the ECB, no doubt some trading firms are using ECB cash to buy stocks directly. But even if they don’t, money that is punished by negative rates in Europe and Japan, heads for the US where it can get a positive return. The banks hedge the currency risk and get cash flow off the arbitrage.

So money continued coming into the US even after the Fed stopped printing. And money will continue to flow in from Europe and Japan, even as the Fed starts draining funds from the US banking system under its euphemistically named program of “normalization.” I believe that that foreign money along with increased leverage in the US as latecomers pile on and shorts get squeezed have driven this rally.

That rally is getting very tired.

And it’s about to get worse.

The Party’s Over – The ECB Is Now Cutting off Our Cash Supply

The ECB is about to print a whole lot less money. Next year, as the Fed ratchets up its withdrawals of cash from the banking system and the market, the amount of those drains will exceed the amount of money that the ECB is printing.

Only some portion of that ECB cash reaches US shores. We can’t say exactly how much. But we do know that in October 2018, the Fed will start pulling $50 billion per month out of the US money pool. We’ve just been given a heads up that the ECB will be printing less than that.

That pool of money is what drives stock pricing. If it is shrinking, so will stock prices shrink. The ECB and BoJ will no longer be sending enough cash to the US to fully offset that.

How do we know that Draghi is about to begin reducing ECB purchases? Because the ECB sent its propaganda henchmen out on the hustings this week to tell us. No doubt Draghi will codify it in Thursday’s ECB policy announcement. But yesterday, we saw it in Bloomberg, and if Bloomberg says it, then yes, Virginia, it must be true.

Santa is about to put coal in your stocking.

Here’s how Bloomberg headlined it on Tuesday: Draghi Seen Going for Bond-Buying Limit in QE’s Last Hurrah

With a subhead: Economists see about 270 billion euros in extra buying in 2018

That sounds like a lot, but it’s only €22.5 billion per month, which is 3/8 of the current purchase rate. The BoJ will also start cutting back purchases soon.

Bloomberg summarized its findings thusly:

The European Central Bank will halve monthly bond purchases to 30 billion euros ($35 billion) next year, stretching out the program’s remaining capacity as it waits for inflation to pick up, a Bloomberg survey of economists shows.

The chart below shows how Bloomberg constructed the consensus forecast of these “economists.” These aren’t just guys on the street. These are connected guys. They work for the banks that deal directly with the ECB. They are plugged in to the top echelons of the ECB. They get the policy skinny directly from the big mahoffs (mahoff is a Philly word that means exactly what it sounds like). It’s not just rank speculation by a bunch of Wall Street TV talking boobs.

There just won’t be enough foreign cash to keep US stock prices afloat as the Fed’s cuts become increasingly draconian over the next 12 months.

According to this, the actual cuts won’t start until January, but no doubt there will be some pre-emptive selling. That and the initial cuts will kneecap the US stock rally. We are talking a tire iron directly to the knees starting in January. Before that, sure, maybe the market can make a marginal new high. But if you are thinking about adding to your longs, you’ll be picking up nickels in front of a steamroller.

How to Prepare Yourself for the Big January Meltdown

If anything, you should be using those rallies to add to your pilot short positions.

Meanwhile the bullish touts will continue to recommend that you buy all kinds of worthless crap. They are setting you up for the kill.

There’s an old saying on Wall Street that you probably know. “Bulls make money, bears make money, and pigs get slaughtered.” The bulls have made money for 8½ solid years. If they aren’t selling yet, and worse, if they are still telling you to buy, they are no longer bulls, they are pigs feeding at the garbage trough. It’s disgusting. Because it’s your money that they are putting at risk.

I have been telling you for the past couple of months to systematically sell rallies to raise a substantial cash cushion. Now that we know that the ECB will stop adding fuel to the market, we’re gonna have a pig roast. You should absolutely stop buying. You should stay on course with your selling program to raise a massive cash hoard by March of next year.

My technical work, which I sell to subscribers of the Wall Street Examiner Pro Trader Reports has, in fact, kept my subscribers overwhelmingly on the long side during the past 7 weeks. But that has started to change as I’ve seen more shorts and fewer longs pop up in our daily screens. In addition, the longs are starting to hit the trailing stops, so we are cashing in profits. And the shorts have begun to turn overwhelmingly profitable.

So the times, they are a-changing. I think that when the Long Term LAMPP turns red, maybe next week or the week after, that the timing on that signal will be good. The technicals are swinging in that direction.

And yes, it is even time to start shorting the SPY, particularly on rallies to resistance levels. I will help you with the timing on those things here, but for more specific suggestions join me at the Wall Street Examiner Pro Trader Market Updates.

In the meantime, don’t buy the dips, and do sell the rips.

And get ready for the Super Crash.


Lee Adler

3 Responses to “This January, We’re Finally Going to Get Our “Super Crash””

  1. Lee, I’m very excited to see your posting here. Your work at the Wall Street Examiner has been spot on. I only wish I hadn’t been so bearish so that I could take advantage of your recommendations on the upside. It will be nice if the market conditions as you see them begin to conform with my inclinations on the downside.

  2. Thanks so much for describing your LAMPP measurement and the Fed’s relationship to the big banks and trading houses. It explains a lot and annoys me at how rigged the process is against the average person and unfairly for Wall Streeters. It smells bad. Thanks for try to make the odds more even.

  3. Larry F Silbaugh

    Great analysis, Lee, but a question: Martin Armstrong seems to agree with you on the funds-flow influences but there seems to possibly be a ratio problem in forecasting the stock effects. If the FED does start clamping down on the money supply what will raising the interest rate counter effects be in the form of sucking cash in from the Japan and Europe? The market seems to be betting that the FED will raise rates but Rickards, who has a pretty good track record in these areas, says flatly that the FED is unlikely to follow through with a rate hike. Your thoughts?

Leave a Comment

View this page online: